> Yes and no. There are still some legacy systems that have problems with
> UTF-8. Supporting them doesn't add any complexity to proposal IMHO. I
> think that support for encoding parameter in XInclude and
> unparsed-text() (XPath 2.0) function shows that there is still demand
> (albeit quite small) for this feature.
Yes, there are some text editors that do not support UTF-8.
But I do not think that users of such editors write RELAX NG
schemas, since schemas are for professionals. And I strongly
believe that the support of non-Unicode encoding introduces
tons of problems, as we have witnessed for HTML and XML.
Cheers,
--
MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "rng-users" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
