On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:51 AM, Jakob Schwendner <[email protected]> wrote: > The good thing about the spreadsheet would be, that we can share the load of > maintaining a bit, and we have a better overview of the distribution.
I like the overview aspect indeed... But that would be useful IMO once most of the "obvious" maintainers are filled in. As for sharing the load, this is IMO a personal matter. If one wants (1) is the obvious choice to maintain 200 packages and (2) wants to do it, then so be it. > we do a small videoconf to discuss ??? I think you are over-thinking this a bit. For most packages, the maintainer will be very clear. Do we need a videoconf discussion about slam/eslam ? Do we about orogen ? I'd like to think that we can manage this as adults. Most packages have clear maintainership / authorship. Let's start with that and deal with the leftovers once we're done. Sylvain _______________________________________________ Rock-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev
