> So the maintainer list is more for bigger organisations to "prevent" devs > there to push each others repos? Or at least to have a reason to blame > someon after he pushed into the repo that is maintained by someone else? The maintainers are there so that there is an identified person to go to for matters related to a software. In particular, but not limited to, when doing releases. How that person deals with people pushing or not to its own repositories is his problem (but could definitely include asking for help on rock-dev)
> Look better, rock-core hat only three owners, the "reviewers" don't have > write access at all ;-) Look *again*. Harder. And again. Until you see it. Sylvain _______________________________________________ Rock-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev
