Hello there (again), I also want to ask about another component that I just realised is available as well called waypoint_navigation which seems to have a much simpler data type for the trajectory (a vector of waypoints). I am wondering now if using waypoint_navigation component might be a better (at least more simple) solution for my problem here. Does anybody know what are the main differences in behaviour of these two components? Any advantages on using the Spline data type and the trajectory follower controller compared to waypoint navigation controller? Looking at the code of both seems like the trajectory_follower uses a PI/PID type of set of controllers while the waypoint navigation does not require setting of any PID gains.
FYI: I have a six wheeled rover, with front and rear steering (no middle wheels steering) with limited max steering angle, but capable of spot turning which I plan to traverse along an uneven planetary simulate terrain at relative slow speeds (in the 5-10cm/s range). Regards, Martin Martin Azkarate TEC-MMA HE Space for ESA - European Space Agency Space Automation and Robotics Engineer ESTEC - European Space research and TEchnology Centre Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk The Netherlands martin.azkar...@esa.int | www.esa.int Tel +31 71 565 3480 | Mob +31 650 625 564 This message and any attachments are intended for the use of the addressee or addressees only. The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either in whole or in part) of its content is not permitted. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your system. Emails can be altered and their integrity cannot be guaranteed by the sender. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
_______________________________________________ Rock-dev mailing list Rock-dev@dfki.de http://www.dfki.de/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/rock-dev
