On 29 March 2010 01:09, Thomas Martitz <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not a fan of this idea, it sounds like [un]necessary complication to me > which adds way more code that some settings in the .cfg. I also don't see > the advantage over (hidden) .cfg settings.
The point of this is to allow users/themers to arbitrarily add configurability to their themes without needing to hack at the real code. I'm not very imaginative but I'm sure someone who is can come up with heaps of uses. To be clear, the config file for this would be completly seperate from config.cfg or core settings. And Paul, yes it would mean people would need to manually edit a text file (Oh the humanity!) > > My other concern is that we should focus on fixing the existing bugs before > introducing even more features (related to the skin engine). Such as?
