-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Allen,
Have you had a chance to look at the tagging code? I want to know what the next steps are. We should have more discussion on the subject if we want to do this with 2.2. - -Elias Allen Gilliland wrote: > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 09:58, David M Johnson wrote: > >>On first glance, I don't see any reason this shouldn't go into trunk. >>Are we happy with the data model? > > > whoa, whoa, whoa! I haven't had a chance to look at this yet, but please > don't rush this into the trunk. I'm not sure if your comment was really > meant to suggest that you felt it was ready for the trunk, but I just want to > be clear. > > -- Allen > > > >>- Dave >> >> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD6075tsNTCOFcV0oRAvGbAJ9nWj7QXiNlCR+OLFw5gQylFczQjwCfbY/S yBpXEaT9MFm9GnHRAN5v19s= =9jrZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
