Unfortunately, no, I haven't had time. I've been pulled off of all my normal blogs/Roller duties to handle an unrelated urgent issue. Hopefully I'll have time to look at it next week.
AFAIK Roller 2.1 still hasn't been released, so I don't think this is at risk for 2.2 yet. -- Allen On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 06:17, Elias Torres wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Allen, > > Have you had a chance to look at the tagging code? I want to know what > the next steps are. We should have more discussion on the subject if we > want to do this with 2.2. > > - -Elias > > Allen Gilliland wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 09:58, David M Johnson wrote: > > > >>On first glance, I don't see any reason this shouldn't go into trunk. > >>Are we happy with the data model? > > > > > > whoa, whoa, whoa! I haven't had a chance to look at this yet, but please > > don't rush this into the trunk. I'm not sure if your comment was really > > meant to suggest that you felt it was ready for the trunk, but I just want > > to be clear. > > > > -- Allen > > > > > > > >>- Dave > >> > >> > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFD6075tsNTCOFcV0oRAvGbAJ9nWj7QXiNlCR+OLFw5gQylFczQjwCfbY/S > yBpXEaT9MFm9GnHRAN5v19s= > =9jrZ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
