On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 16:37, Sean Gilligan wrote:
> > there is no need to [update the proposal].  the proposal is old and is only 
> > meant as a
> > description of work to be done.  now that the work is complete if would
> > be tiresome to keep the proposals up to date.
> 
> I understand.  Personally, I find the old proposals helpful in 
> understanding the details of particular features and why they were 
> implemented.  If I find or get useful information from a list, I figure 
> I should share it with others in the Wiki.  A small contribution to 
> documentation, I suppose.  Not a big deal.
> 

Absolutely.  The better documentation we have the better, and we
definitely appreciate that you are willing to help with this.

> > 
> >  The ability to change your default
> > template was removed on purpose.
> > 
> >> Would it be possible and/or desirable to re-enable the ability to change 
> >> the default without renaming/deleting the required "Weblog" template?
> > 
> > pretty unlikely, but you can try if you like.  like i said, there were
> > technical reasons for making this change which affected the caching
> > system, the way urls were handled, the theme system, etc.
> 
> I started to look at the form and objects code to see if this feature 
> could be re-enabled and submitted as a patch to the project.  However, 
> in this case it sounds like the removal of that feature is a closed 
> issue. I'd only be interested in doing that work if it could be included 
> in Roller itself.  In any event, I wouldn't want to break caching or url 
> handling...

My personal opinion is that this was a case of a double edged blade.  I
knew that the change for standardized templates was going to make things
more difficult in the case you mentioned in this thread, but I felt that
the benefits outweighed the costs in the long run.

> 
>    i'm sorry
> > that it has caused you a little extra work.
> 
> I don't really mind the extra work (of copy/pasting templates) if it was 
> just for me, but I'm looking to Roller as a solution for other users, 
> too. I am willing within my ability and available time to contribute 
> improvements and thought this might be an area where I could help.  In 
> my opinion the difficulty of template customization is one of the 
> biggest weaknesses of Roller as compared to other blogging software I've 
> worked with (Movable Type and Blogger)  So, this is an area where I'd 
> like to help.

This I am in absolute agreement with and I would be more than happy to
try and work out some ways to improve our templating situation.  This is
something that I have marked on my future TODO list, but there are quite
a few other things to do first.

I would definitely be interested in what you had in mind though.

-- Allen


> 
> Regards,
> 
> Sean

Reply via email to