On 3/3/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 17:09, David M Johnson wrote:

> >
> > Whoa!
> >
> > I'm totally against the idea of breaking Planet out into a separate
> > Apache project with it's own set committers. I was thinking more
> > along the lines of "IDE project file." This is a code organization
> > and build script thing, not a people thing, right?
> >
> > You weren't proposing a whole new Apache project were you Allen?
> >
> > The Apache Roller project can certainly ship different modules or
> > applications like Roller Admin Console, Roller Planet Server or even
> > Roller Blog Client.
>
> Nope, that's not what I was suggesting.  I am more than happy to keep it as 
> part of the Apache Roller project and just keep it in its own place, like the 
> way the sandbox works.
>
> I suppose the one nice thing about it being its own project is that then it 
> would be easier to recruit interest in it, but that's not what my original 
> intentions were.

Oops. My mistake, got confused by the term 'project'.

+1 to a separated codebase.

Hen

Reply via email to