On 3/3/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 17:09, David M Johnson wrote:
> > > > Whoa! > > > > I'm totally against the idea of breaking Planet out into a separate > > Apache project with it's own set committers. I was thinking more > > along the lines of "IDE project file." This is a code organization > > and build script thing, not a people thing, right? > > > > You weren't proposing a whole new Apache project were you Allen? > > > > The Apache Roller project can certainly ship different modules or > > applications like Roller Admin Console, Roller Planet Server or even > > Roller Blog Client. > > Nope, that's not what I was suggesting. I am more than happy to keep it as > part of the Apache Roller project and just keep it in its own place, like the > way the sandbox works. > > I suppose the one nice thing about it being its own project is that then it > would be easier to recruit interest in it, but that's not what my original > intentions were. Oops. My mistake, got confused by the term 'project'. +1 to a separated codebase. Hen