On Sat, 2006-03-04 at 10:03 -0800, Allen Gilliland wrote: > > Brian Blakeley wrote: > > > > >I wonder as a user, could I comment here on this discussion? > > > > > > sure, you can always comment. > > >I hope that a "separate code" would not lead to either a different > >release cycle or a separate install process. CheBlogs.com runs on > >Roller and I administer it as a "hobby gone bad", so the thought that I > >may have to monitor and maintain separate projects to get the existing > >functionality of Roller (which I really am committed to using) in the > >future is a real concern to me. > > > > > > we are never going to purposly try and make things harder on users, so i > don't think you need to worry about it. > > -- Allen >
Thanks Allen! > >As it is I have been lagging in updating the site to the latest and the > >greatest because of the stress to me of managing a switch in the site's > >critical software. I believe I started CheBlogs.com with Roller 0.96(?) > >(March 26, 2003) and then upgraded to Roller 0.971, and I am just about > >to move from 1.0 to 2.1 and I am looking forward to the improvements > >that I know are there waiting for me and my users. Planet being a real > >plus in my mind since, as I understand it, I can use it to create a > >refined community of bloggers that doesn't include the ED, viagara, > >weight lose, and ring tones crowd that I am constantly removing from the > >main site's front page. > > > >Sorry, for the lengthy interjection, but although I may not be a > >"costumer" of Roller in the new (and rather odd) world of Apache as I > >have been reading, I am a to date proud and happy user of some excellent > >work by Dave and company! > > > > > >Brian > > > > > > > >
