On 3/5/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 12:31, Matt Raible wrote: > > On 3/4/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 3/4/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Last thing (hopefully) - my list of Spam Prevention keywords got wiped > > > > out by the upgrade. Was this intentional? I had my referrer list > > > > widdled down to something reasonable - but now it's back to spam > > > > (seemingly b/c these were removed). > > > > > > OK, I got this one fixed by copying from the dump I did. However, I > > > found another one. My main page used to be named "_sunsets". Sure > > > this looked funny when viewing an individual entries (b/c the > > > next/prev links had "_sunsets" in it). But now my main page seems to > > > be hardcoded to "_Weblog" - and I can't change the name. In addition, > > > my "Weblog" page was used for my old theme - which now doesn't work > > > anymore. > > > > > > I admit this is trivial, but I'm willing to bet there's a lot of URLs > > > out there that refer to my site that have /Weblog and /sunsets in them > > > - and they're no longer valid. Hopefully it's possible that these > > > links still refer to the same content. > > The old urls should still be working. Did you verify that you had urls > that were no longer working anymore before hacking at things? > > > > > I was able to fix this by changing website.defaultpageid to my > > "sunsets" page. However, I can't get Roller to bring up my "Weblog" > > page, even when I use /page/rd/Weblog. So it seems that it's > > hardcoded that Weblog == defaultpageid. > > That is probably not a good idea Matt, but you are definitely free to do > whatever you want. > > One strong reason for standardizing the "Weblog" template is because in > reality it is a special template which should not be accessed via a page > name, instead it should only be used when someone is not trying to reach > a specific page name, i.e. via /roller/page/myweblog
Right, but the "Weblog" name does show up in permalinks. If I change my "sunsets" page from _sunsets/sunsets to Weblog/_Weblog, then the following URL quits working: http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd/sunsets/which_ajax_enabled_framework_should Of course, this one works regardless of whether I have a page named Weblog or not: http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd/Weblog/which_ajax_enabled_framework_should Some more interesting behavior here - if I hit /page/rd/Weblog as the first page when restarting my server - the x2 theme shows up as the default. Clear the cache and sunsets is back to the default. This is likely because I have the defaultpageid set to the sunsets page rather than the Weblog page. The best solution for the time being seems to be getting rid of the Weblog page altogether. I'm hoping to re-design my site this month - so hopefully this strictness will no longer matter to me. Matt > > -- Allen > > > > > > I don't want to argue if this is a good idea or not - I'd rather just > > fix my version to have different behavior (like v 2.0 had). How would > > I go about doing this? > > > > Also, it'd be nice if "Weblog" in "<< Weblog >>" was hard-coded to > > "Weblog", "Main" or "Home". On mine, it shows "_sunsets", which looks > > kindof silly. Sure I could rename it to "Weblog" or "Home", but then > > it shows up in my menu bar, and I already have a "Home" that does the > > same thing. Unlike many roller installations, the root (/) of my > > domain redirects to the default weblog and I don't really care to > > expose the list blogs (JRoller style) as my homepage. > > > > Finally, the name and link fields on the Templates page are disabled > > if you're editing Weblog or _day templates. To edit these fields, > > save the template, and then they'll be enabled. Probably a bug, eh? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > On 3/4/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Another issue: > > > > > > > > > > In 2.0, the "previous entries" link was removed from the bottom of a > > > > > page. I still don't seem them with 2.1. Do I need to modify my > > > > > template? > > > > > > > > > > I thought you guys brought these back? Or are they only in 2.2? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > On 3/4/06, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I saw this on JRoller when they upgraded to a rc of 2.1... > > > > > > > > > > > > I just upgraded raibledesigns.com to 2.1 and my comments now say > > > > > > HTML > > > > > > Syntax is *Off* even though it's *On*. I see the same problem at > > > > > > JRoller, except it says it's On when it's Off. Doing a view-source > > > > > > shows a missing class it seems: > > > > > > > > > > > > <span style=""> > > > > > > HTML Syntax: > > > > > > <span class="enabled">Off</span> > > > > > > </span> > > > > > > > > > > > > Any ideas how to fix this? > > > > > > > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
