Thanks Dave! The page is much more readable now. I have updated the page with answers to most of your todo's. Regarding my progress I now have edit-ui for tags, tags tab in frontpage, hot tags in sidebar. From a code perspective this means, pojos, weblogmanager, sitemodel and struts together with .vm/.jsp changes are done.
Things to do: - entries for specific tags (and their pagers) - feeds - type-ahead servlet - parameterize the tags tab in frontpage - .. and code thread to optimize the aggregation for large sites (i.e. pre-compute tagclouds) Any more feedback on the proposal? Should I email asking for a vote? -Elias Dave wrote: > Oops. Here's the link: > <http://rollerweblogger.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Proposal_WeblogTags> > > - Dave > > > > On 9/18/06, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I review the tagging proposal and (with Elias' permission) reformatted >> it for readbililty. I also added some comments and a couple of TODO >> and ISSUE markers to indicate places that need clarification. >> >> Please review and provide feedback. How close are we to agreement on >> this proposal? >> >> - Dave >> >> >> >> On 9/18/06, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On 9/15/06, Elias Torres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > I have begun writing some of the tagging support for Roller 3.1 and I >> > > have a basic unit working. I've created WeblogEntryTagData and added >> > > methods to WeblogEntryData to support Tagging. I've also written 10 >> > > tests in WeblogEntryTest.java and of course added support in the >> editing >> > > UI to manage tags. >> > >> > Personally, I'd like to see a complete proposal before work begins -- >> > i.e. a list of the specific methods w/signatures that will be added to >> > the managers and page models, a list of the macros that will be >> > required, etc. Listing those page models and macros could reveal some >> > data model deficiencies. >> > >> > That said, I'm not opposed to committing partial work as long as we >> > have consensus on the proposal (I think we do) and there is a >> > commitment to finish it. >> > >> > BUT... Please wait until I create a Roller 3.0 release branch from the >> > trunk today (I just reviewed the changes since RC1 and the non-sandbox >> > ones look good for 3.0). >> > >> > - Dave >> > >> >
