Dave wrote:
On 9/19/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
a few more little odds and ends ...
1. I'd prefer we not call the aggregate data "clouds". I think we can
find a better name that describes the data.
Wha? That's what everybody calls them, why make up a new term for
something that already has a universally accepted name?
I think I confused you. I am talking about the db table and pojo class
not being termed a 'cloud', I am not saying the data wouldn't be used to
display a tag cloud which can be called whatever you want.
The reason I don't like that name for the table and pojo is because it's
misleading. The data itself is just aggregated metadata about the use
of tags and we can use that data in many ways, one way being to create a
tag cloud. The term 'cloud' simply describes the visual arrangement of
the tag aggregate data, not what the data itself represents.
-- Allen
- Dave
