Dave wrote:
On 10/13/06, Allen Gilliland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm pretty much out of time now. I spent way too much time fighting
> Hibernate bulk-delete. So now I'm wondering, should we:
I don't mind doing part of this work if that would help. I think it's
still reasonable to do this for 3.1 and I can spend a little time to
look at it today.
Excellent. I need to focus on wrapping up my planet work now.
okay, I have this ready to commit now. I've only created editors for
Text and Xinha, so none of the other old ones will work anymore.
> 1) use SQL in the migration script to switch users from editor-rte.jsp
> to editor-xinha.jsp. I have the necessary one-liner ready to commit.
yep.
>
> 2) leave both RTE and Xinha both in place for now, or at least during
> testing.
I am definitely -1 to this, I don't think we want to start adding new
editors to the list. In fact, I would prefer that we delete all those
old editors from svn that we no longer support and if we want them to be
kept around then put them over at roller_support.
OK, option #1 it is. I'll commit that migration code and delete RTE from
SVN.
1 minor change. I have give each editor an "id" which is meant to
identify the editor and that's what gets stored in the db for a weblog's
editor preference. We can make these whatever we want, but since we are
doing this migration for rte I think it makes sense to just clean this
up now. So when you add this sql can you do it for the text editor as well?
update website set editorpage = 'TextEditor' where editorpage =
'editor-text.jsp';
update website set editorpage = 'XinhaEditor' where editorpage =
'editor-rte.jsp';
or whatever other way you were going to do it. the key is that the text
editor should now be 'TextEditor' rather than 'editor-text.jsp' and the
new Xinha editor should be 'XinhaEditor'.
-- Allen
- Dave
