+1

Allen Gilliland wrote:
> guys,
> 
> I've come across a bit of a quirk/bug in Roller based on the fact that
> we have Acegi configured to take over the use of the /j_security_check
> url for doing logins.
> 
> It appears that the way the j_security_check url is handled varies
> between the different containers and after doing some testing on some of
> the Sun containers I've found that they enforce more strict rules on how
> that url can be used which breaks our Acegi login process.  Basically,
> on some containers a form posting to /j_security_check will never make
> it to the Acegi security filter because the container won't allow it.
> 
> I have read through the servlet spec and asked some of the Sun Webserver
> team for their input on the issue and the fact is that this is a kind of
> gray area which is not explicitly detailed in the servlet spec. However,
> the recommendation was that we should probably not be trying to use the
> j_security_check for Acegi authentication because it can interfere with
> the way that container-managed security is meant to work.
> 
> The ramifications of this bug are that you can't deploy Roller to some
> containers and have it work without having to hand modify a couple of
> files within the webapp.  To fix the issue is actually very simple, all
> that is required is for us to change the Acegi authentication posting
> url from /j_security_check to anything else, i.e.
> /roller_j_security_check would work fine.  As far as I can see there is
> no real downside to doing this and no real reason why we need to use
> /j_security_check as the url for Acegi authentication.
> 
> So, I'd like to propose that we change this in Roller so that by default
> Roller will avoid any possible collision conflicts with the way
> containers handle the /j_security_check url.
> 
> Thoughts?  Anyone object to this change?
> 
> -- Allen
> 

Reply via email to