Sir Gallantmon wrote: > The import support for MSVC projects is not perfect, so it shouldn't > be relied on.
Well, then it should be the Code::Blocks people who better improve their import system. It would benefit them more than us, because they would improve the compatibility with lots of MSVC projects out there. If we would have enough manpower to maintain the Code::Blocks backend and see the advantages in using it, we would most-likely keep it. But as there is already a consent among the devs that this backend is a candidate for deletion, it should be obvious that we don't have the manpower. The Code::Blocks people should rather have it, because they can exclusively focus on creating an IDE while we currently need to care about Build systems, code all the way up from kernel-mode to user-mode, the Website components, etc with just a small team. Just my 2 cents for justifying in detail why we're removing the backend. Best regards, Colin _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
