i hope you dont mean we no-devs cant discuss stuff and even learn from you On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Alex Ionescu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Ergo, we may define them to correctly reflect the EFLAGS register. > > Who is "WE"? You're not even a DEV for this project! > > > > > However, but I think Alex is right that the compatible identifiers > > should be retained. > > EFLAG_SIGN and EFLAG_ZERO are used to compare flags in AH after LAHF, > > and should be retained verbatim, since they are public (in NTDDK.H). > > As for any MS EFLAGS_xx definitions, I'm not privvy and can't say. > > Then shut up and don't post completely USELESS and wrong information. > >
_______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
