Alex Ionescu wrote: > This is retarded, That's your opinion. > Why did this require rewriting everything in AT&T syntax and introducing > bugs? It doesn't. Noone said it does.
> And what's up with calling AT&T syntax "GAS" Syntax. > Yes, what's up with that? > I wonder what Brian would say.... > Why don't you ask him and report back to us? > It's funny how this project gets rid of old developers, gets new > developers, and has them make the same mistakes/idiotic things the old > developers left for in the first place... > Did you leave for AT&T syntax? Too bad. Anyway, that kinda forces them to find new reasons to leave, doesn't it? That's innovation! Regards, Timo _______________________________________________ Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
