> You'd still use the same templating system. You'd just pass the form object > to the template instead of passing a bunch of separate values. The gist of > it is:
> ... Thanks for this clarification. I'm in almost the same situation as Michael. I will try to build a small sample application which follows these instructions (it will be a Catalyst app) and post it to the list. So John can comment and we all can learn. I'm going to a conference this week, so maybe I find a litte spare time there... > As you can see, it's a two-step process: init form object with CGI params, > then get an object from the form. That said, I do think a convenience > method named init_with_cgi() would be handy. I'll probably add it in the > next release. Please allow also "CGI compatible" objects (= having a param() method functioning like CGI's). That way also other modules (e. g. web frameworks) can be used. Good bye, Uwe ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
