On 2/27/06, Rob Kinyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/27/06, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yeah, that's what I planned. Although the APIs will have "cgi" in
>> their names, all that will be requires is a param() method that works
>> like CGI's.
>
> You should probably elaborate here. CGI.pm has a TON of dwimmery that
> isn't immediately obvious.
>
> What exactly is the behavior that Rose expects from a CGI.pm-like
> param() method? Are there any other expectations, such as a new()
> method or an expected set of DESTROY semantics?
Yeah, I'll spell it out in the docs. Basically, all I need to for
consumption by Rose::HTML::Form is build is a structure like this:
{
name => 'John', # param with single value
color => [ 'red', 'green' ], # param with multiple values
...
}
I think all I need is:
* $o->param() in list context returns a list of param names
* $o->param('foo') in list context returns a list of values
for any object $o. CGI.pm fits the bill, as do most other modules
that imitate CGI.pm's param() method, even minimally.
-John
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
