On 2/27/06, John Siracusa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, that's what I planned. Although the APIs will have "cgi" in > their names, all that will be requires is a param() method that works > like CGI's.
You should probably elaborate here. CGI.pm has a TON of dwimmery that isn't immediately obvious. What exactly is the behavior that Rose expects from a CGI.pm-like param() method? Are there any other expectations, such as a new() method or an expected set of DESTROY semantics? Rob ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
