Hello, to give you a second example I will show my "class schema"...
> * PDQ::DB - Rose::DB subclass, all data sources registered here > > * PDQ::DB::Object - Rose::DB::Object subclass with init_db overridden > to return a PDQ::DB object > > * PDQ::DB::Object::Cached - (Optional) subclass of > Rose::DB::Object::Cached and PDQ::DB::Object, used as a base class for > any cached objects. > > * PDQ::DB::Object::Manager - (Optional) Rose::DB::Object::Manager > subclass, in case you want to add methods to all your managers. PDQ::DB - contains data sources PDQ::RDB - Rose::DB subclass (maybe not needed) PDQ::RDBO - Rose::DB::Object subclass PDQ::RDBOM - Rose::DB::Object::Manger subclass PDQ::Data::Product = PDQ::Product PDQ::Manager::Product = PDQ::Product::Manager The most difference is, that I separate Data (the object) and Manager, instead of "Product" and "Product::Manager". But this is just personal taste. Bye, Uwe ------------------------------------------------------- All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk! Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
