Hm...

It seems a bit tricky to keep things nice and subclassed as I want.

I was hoping on doing something like:

MyObj
MyObj::Manager
MyObj::Cached

but what I've realized is that do handle the cached, I'd need something like-

MyObj
MyObj::Manager
MyObj::Cached
MyObj::Cached::Manager

or

MyObj
MyObj::Manager
MyObjCached
MyObjCached::Manager


unless there is a way to do...

MyObj
MyObj::live
MyObj::live::manager
MyObj::cached
MyObj::cached::manager

where i would stuff the table def in myobj... not sure if thats possible

not sure if anyone understands what I'm talking about either - basically i want to define the table structure 1x, and have live + cached instances + managers of that





-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to