On May 23, 2006, at 3:52 PM, John Siracusa wrote:
The benefits of having a Manager for a ::Cached class are dubious.
Unless you plan to save() (or remember() or forget()) some of the
objects returned by the Manager, it doesn't really matter whether the
Manager's object_class is ::Cached or not.
well in this case I want want to preload an entire table using cached - as
you suggested
its my naive understanding that in order to load everything ( ie, no
primary key ) i need to use a manager
since i need to load via a manager and save cached, it seems like a need a
cached version of manager
is that completley misunderstood?
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
