On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Ron Savage wrote: > On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 00:15 -0500, John Siracusa wrote: >> I think we need a mutable object representation of SQL first, the the > > You mean like SQL::Abstract?
No, definitely not like SQL::Abstract :) SQLA provides a very limited set of features: feed in Perl data structures and get out an SQL string and some bind values. I want something a lot more flexible. It's like the difference between producing HTML forms using CGI.pm and doing the same thing using Rose::HTML::Objects. I want a generic tree of mutable objects (cross-linked to the relevant bits of table metadata so they can be "smart") that only serializes to an SQL string on demand at the very end of the process. -John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
