On 11/27/2007 07:32 AM, John Siracusa wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Ron Savage wrote:
>> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 00:15 -0500, John Siracusa wrote:
>>> I think we need a mutable object representation of SQL first, the the
>> You mean like SQL::Abstract?
> 
> No, definitely not like SQL::Abstract :)  SQLA provides a very limited  
> set of features: feed in Perl data structures and get out an SQL  
> string and some bind values.  I want something a lot more flexible.   
> It's like the difference between producing HTML forms using CGI.pm and  
> doing the same thing using Rose::HTML::Objects.  I want a generic tree  
> of mutable objects (cross-linked to the relevant bits of table  
> metadata so they can be "smart") that only serializes to an SQL string  
> on demand at the very end of the process.
> 

fwiw, the DBIC folks have been discussing this very topic lately:

http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/2007-November/005320.html

-- 
Peter Karman  .  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  .  http://peknet.com/


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Rose-db-object mailing list
Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object

Reply via email to