On 11/27/2007 07:32 AM, John Siracusa wrote: > On Nov 27, 2007, at 12:50 AM, Ron Savage wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 00:15 -0500, John Siracusa wrote: >>> I think we need a mutable object representation of SQL first, the the >> You mean like SQL::Abstract? > > No, definitely not like SQL::Abstract :) SQLA provides a very limited > set of features: feed in Perl data structures and get out an SQL > string and some bind values. I want something a lot more flexible. > It's like the difference between producing HTML forms using CGI.pm and > doing the same thing using Rose::HTML::Objects. I want a generic tree > of mutable objects (cross-linked to the relevant bits of table > metadata so they can be "smart") that only serializes to an SQL string > on demand at the very end of the process. >
fwiw, the DBIC folks have been discussing this very topic lately: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/2007-November/005320.html -- Peter Karman . [EMAIL PROTECTED] . http://peknet.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Rose-db-object mailing list Rose-db-object@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rose-db-object
