I am trying to model a variation of a composite pattern (from Gamma et al) in Data Modeller. The generated data model is technically correct, but the names of the foreign keys (to the primary key in the same table) get very bad (on a COL_* pattern). Any ideas on how to make these more legible? As you can see from the attached jpg, I'm trying to use role/assoc names, but they don't seem to have the desired effect. This is Rose 2001, btw. <<dmquestion.jpg>> ADCORE Digital Business Creators Mobile +47 90 75 19 85 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: 1236925, IM: Krosenvold <<Kristian Rosenvold.vcf>>
- RE: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model relations to sel... Kristian Rosenvold
- RE: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model relations t... Gornik, Davor
- RE: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model relations t... Kristian Rosenvold
- RE: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model relations t... Naiburg, Eric J.
- (ROSE) Rose 2001 Phil Lewis
- RE: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model relations t... Prajesh, Jim
- RE: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model relations t... Kristian Rosenvold
- RE: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model relations t... Walter Howard
- RE: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model relations t... Gornik, Davor
- RE: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model relations t... Walter Howard
- RE: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model relations t... Gornik, Davor
Kristian Rosenvold.vcf