Walter
>>> Kristian Rosenvold
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 01/11/01 08:17AM
>>>
Ok, it seems like I need this veeery slowly. I just
defined another model
with some different multiplicities. Still, none of
them seem to get proper
names for the foreign key for the relation to
self. The "TestKey" attribute
is "part of object identity". Modeller
obviously understands the reference
to self because the datatype of the
foreign key is correct, but the names go
on and on in the COLxx fashion.
I know I can change the names manually in the data model, it's just
such a
pain. But I suppose there should be some pain in life
;)
Kristian
Attached is JPG of a model that I just made from
scratch, in case there is
any stuff left in the repository
class.
-----Original Message-----
From: Prajesh, Jim
To:
Naiburg, Eric J.; Kristian Rosenvold; Gornik,
Davor;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11.01.01 14:20
Subject: RE:
(ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model relations to self
The foreign key
name migration works properly only when the
multiplicity
is
defined. If the multiplicity is not defined, the
translation tool still
migrates a foreign key (Not sure how it knows) but
just calls the FK
COL1 or
something like that. But if you have
the cardinality specified then it
uses
the name of the primary key of
the parent table. Not sure of the reason
but
that is how it
behaves.
Eric: Would it be better if we issue a warning in the log
file saying
that
we could not figure out how to migrate the foreign
key because the
multiplicity is not defined? Just a
thought.
-----Original Message-----
From: Naiburg, Eric J. [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
Thursday, January 11, 2001 2:26 AM
To: 'Kristian Rosenvold'; Gornik,
Davor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object
Model relations to self
The foreign keys are created based on
the primary key names. You can
describe the primary keys in the
object model by right-click on the
appropriate attribute in the browser
and selecting Data Modeler --> Part
of
Object
Identity.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kristian Rosenvold [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
Wednesday, January 10, 2001 5:46 AM
To: 'Gornik, Davor';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model
relations to self
As I understand you, there is no way to
influence the names of the
foreign
keys from the object model ?
Pity ;) I thought that was what assoc/role names were all
about!
Kristian
-----Original Message-----
From: Gornik,
Davor [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
10. januar 2001 14:20
To: Kristian Rosenvold;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model
relations to self
Kristian,
You can rename the foreign key
constraints to whatever you want after
the
generation. The conversion
just uses a unique name. Same of course with
the
column
names.
Davor Gornik
Marketing Engineer Rose Business
Unit
Rational Software Tel:
+49-89-62838-249
Keltenring
15 Fax:
+49-89-62838-549
82041 Oberhaching Cel:
+49-170-4532-249
Germany
Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Rational
User Conference 2001
July 22 - 26, 2001 * Denver, CO, USA
http://www.rational.com/ruc-----Original
Message-----
From: Kristian Rosenvold [
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent:
Wednesday, January 10, 2001 11:37 AM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model
relations to self
I am trying to model a variation of a composite
pattern (from Gamma et
al)
in Data Modeller. The generated data model
is technically correct, but
the
names of the foreign keys (to the
primary key in the same table) get
very
bad (on a COL_* pattern). Any
ideas on how to make these more legible?
As
you can see from the
attached jpg, I'm trying to use role/assoc names,
but
they don't seem
to have the desired effect.
This is Rose 2001,
btw.
<<dmquestion.jpg>>
ADCORE
Digital
Business Creators
Mobile +47 90 75 19 85
<
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ICQ: 1236925, IM: Krosenvold
<<Kristian Rosenvold.vcf>>
************************************************************************
*
Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical
support, visit
http://www.rational.com/support*
*
Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of
messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl*
Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from
the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe
rose_forum
*
************************************************************************
*
************************************************************************
*
Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical
support, visit
http://www.rational.com/support*
*
Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of
messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl*
Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from
the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe
rose_forum
*
************************************************************************
*
