Kristian,
You can rename the foreign key constraints to whatever you want after the
generation. The conversion just uses a unique name. Same of course with the
column names.
Davor Gornik
Marketing Engineer Rose Business Unit
Rational Software Tel: +49-89-62838-249
Keltenring 15 Fax: +49-89-62838-549
82041 Oberhaching Cel: +49-170-4532-249
Germany Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Rational User Conference 2001
July 22 - 26, 2001 * Denver, CO, USA
http://www.rational.com/ruc
-----Original Message-----
From: Kristian Rosenvold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 11:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (ROSE) Data Modeller: Object Model relations to self
I am trying to model a variation of a composite pattern (from Gamma et al)
in Data Modeller. The generated data model is technically correct, but the
names of the foreign keys (to the primary key in the same table) get very
bad (on a COL_* pattern). Any ideas on how to make these more legible? As
you can see from the attached jpg, I'm trying to use role/assoc names, but
they don't seem to have the desired effect.
This is Rose 2001, btw.
<<dmquestion.jpg>>
ADCORE
Digital Business Creators
Mobile +47 90 75 19 85
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: 1236925, IM: Krosenvold
<<Kristian Rosenvold.vcf>>
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
