We have upgraded a few weeks ago from RR2001 to RR2001A, but had afterwards
more problems than before, so we stopped the migration and made a step back.
It's not clear when we use a newer version than 2001.03.00.
Olaf M�nnig
--------------------
Diplom-Informatiker Olaf M�nnig
T-Systems
debis Systemhaus GEI GmbH
Martin-Schmei�er-Weg 18, D-44227 Dortmund
Telefon: +49 (231) 9744 664
Telefax: +49 (231) 9744 600
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.t-systems.de
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vu, Hai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 3:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: (ROSE) Transition to Rose2001A
>
>
>
> There is no patch for Rose 2001A for Windows that I am aware
> of, but I had the misfortune of upgrading to 2001A and
> discovered that it still has a bug that was fixed in 2001
> with Patch1. I had advised people at my company against
> upgrading to 2001A and I would advise the same to anyone
> else until a patch is issued. I think Rational dropped the
> ball in this case.
>
> Hai Vu
> Mitel Networks
> 613-592-2122
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 4:33 AM
> To: Vladimir Riecicky
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: (ROSE) Transition to Rose2001A
>
>
>
>
> Vladimir,
>
> I'm using 2001a.04.01.293.011 (That's with the patch for it). I have
> noticed from producing activity diagrams that they don't
> quite behave as
> expected. The problems I've noticed are when you've tidied
> and layed out
> the diagram as you want it, save it and load it at a later
> date. When you
> load it in, the sizing of all the activities has gone mad! This is
> especially true when I've included activities from other
> packages within my
> model. This is even true with all other diagrams.
> Sometimes I don't even
> have to reload it for it to go mad, it will do it itself.
> So it sounds as
> if there are still quirks in the system.
>
> Haydn
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Vladimir Riecicky"
>
> <Vladimir.Riecicky@ To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ascom.ch> cc:
>
> Sent by: Subject:
> (ROSE) Transition to Rose2001A
> owner-rose_forum@ra
>
> tional.com
>
>
>
>
>
> 26/07/2001 08:54
>
> Please respond to
>
> "Vladimir Riecicky"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am currently using Rose release version 2001.03.00 and considering
> transition to Rose2001A. Before I start doing any
> installations and Rose
> updates I would like to disscus this issue with anyone
> having practical
> experience with it. The main reason for this transition from
> my point of
> view is terrible (undesired) layout automation of Activity
> diagrams in the
> currently used Rose release version (esspecially Objects in
> combination
> with Swimlanes).
>
> Thease are my questions:
> - Isn't there any patch or workarround to fix the above
> mentioned situation
> with layout for Rose 2001.03 ?
> - Esspecially I am interested, if concepts of Objects and
> Object flows
> within Activity diagrams has been changed ?(These are
> essential parts of my
> models)
> - May I expect smothed loading of my current models after
> transition ?
>
> Thanks for your comments in advance.
>
> Regards,
> Vladimir.
>
>
>
> --
> Haydn Robinson
>
> Software Engineer
> Sophos Anti-Virus
> http://www.sophos.com
> email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> UK Support : +44 1235 559933
> Direct Line: +44 1235 544090
>
> *************************************************************
> ***********
> * Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
> * For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
> *
> * Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
