I have posted this bug in the forum before and got no response, but basically it goes
like this: "When I open up a model that has to load in the properties from a
controlled unit, i.e. all model properties reside in an external file (.prp) instead
of inside the model file (.mdl), some of my customized properties were overwritten
with some default values. I had to manually reload the property file in order to get
all my custom properties."
Hai Vu
Mitel Networks
613-592-2122
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir Riecicky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 9:50 AM
To: Vu, Hai
Subject: RE: (ROSE) Transition to Rose2001A
What kind of bug are writing about Hai Vu ?
(Does it have smth to do with Objects and Object Flows of Activity diagrams ?)
Vladimir.
"Vu, Hai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
26.07.01 15:02
Please respond to "Vu, Hai"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: (ROSE) Transition to Rose2001A
There is no patch for Rose 2001A for Windows that I am aware of, but I had the
misfortune of upgrading to 2001A and discovered that it still has a bug that was fixed
in 2001 with Patch1. I had advised people at my company against upgrading to 2001A and
I would advise the same to anyone else until a patch is issued. I think Rational
dropped the ball in this case.
Hai Vu
Mitel Networks
613-592-2122
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 4:33 AM
To: Vladimir Riecicky
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (ROSE) Transition to Rose2001A
Vladimir,
I'm using 2001a.04.01.293.011 (That's with the patch for it). I have
noticed from producing activity diagrams that they don't quite behave as
expected. The problems I've noticed are when you've tidied and layed out
the diagram as you want it, save it and load it at a later date. When you
load it in, the sizing of all the activities has gone mad! This is
especially true when I've included activities from other packages within my
model. This is even true with all other diagrams. Sometimes I don't even
have to reload it for it to go mad, it will do it itself. So it sounds as
if there are still quirks in the system.
Haydn
"Vladimir Riecicky"
<Vladimir.Riecicky@ To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ascom.ch> cc:
Sent by: Subject: (ROSE) Transition to
Rose2001A
owner-rose_forum@ra
tional.com
26/07/2001 08:54
Please respond to
"Vladimir Riecicky"
Hi,
I am currently using Rose release version 2001.03.00 and considering
transition to Rose2001A. Before I start doing any installations and Rose
updates I would like to disscus this issue with anyone having practical
experience with it. The main reason for this transition from my point of
view is terrible (undesired) layout automation of Activity diagrams in the
currently used Rose release version (esspecially Objects in combination
with Swimlanes).
Thease are my questions:
- Isn't there any patch or workarround to fix the above mentioned situation
with layout for Rose 2001.03 ?
- Esspecially I am interested, if concepts of Objects and Object flows
within Activity diagrams has been changed ?(These are essential parts of my
models)
- May I expect smothed loading of my current models after transition ?
Thanks for your comments in advance.
Regards,
Vladimir.
--
Haydn Robinson
Software Engineer
Sophos Anti-Virus
http://www.sophos.com
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UK Support : +44 1235 559933
Direct Line: +44 1235 544090
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages:
http://www.rational.com/products/rose/usergroups/rose_forum.jtmpl
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************
