I would do so. Actually, I had the same problem, and modeled a
generalization of actors. It works fine!
However, what does "working fine" mean? We built a pure analysis model, and,
well, by nature we have no problems with generalization of actors. You
should exactly evaluate, if generalization is possible and reasonable (as
you do with classes).
Greetings,
Olaf
-------------------
Diplom-Informatiker Olaf M�nnig
T-Systems
debis Systemhaus GEI GmbH
Martin-Schmei�er-Weg 18, D-44227 Dortmund
Telefon: +49 (231) 9744 664
Telefax: +49 (231) 9744 600
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.t-systems.de <http://www.t-systems.de/>
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 10:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (ROSE) Modeling Collaboration/Sequence diagrams with 2 Primary
Actors?
Hey All,
I have a use case "Request A Report" with two primary actors (Carrier and
Customer). Writing
the use case was fairly easy just referring to the Actors like so: "The
Carrier/Customer navigates to..."
But now that I've moved onto Collaboration Diagrams and most importantly
Sequence Diagrams,
I'm stumped on how this should be modeled to represent the two Actors for
the one behavior (Request A Report).
The overall system I'm building is web based, with two identified actors,
Carrier and Customer. For functionality that is used
by both actors should I document and model using a User actor? Meaning,
should I use generalization:
Carrier and Customer are "types of" Users.
************************************************************************
* Rose Forum is a public venue for ideas and discussions.
* For technical support, visit http://www.rational.com/support
*
* Admin.Subscription Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Archive of messages: http://www.rational.com/support/usergroups/rose/rose_forum.jsp
* Other Requests: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* To unsubscribe from the list, please send email
*
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Subject:<BLANK>
* Body: unsubscribe rose_forum
*
*************************************************************************