On Saturday 07 June 2003 14:00, Levi Burton wrote:
>
> Well, I guess my thoughts went something like this -- checking pointers for
> implicit assumptions they are not null, and when they are, terminating the
> program then and there, with line information and all that jazz.
Yes, that's what assert() is for, but you want that during test & debug, not
when recording music :-).
> So, basically checking every assumption that *pointer is not null with an
> assert(). I am guessing thats a shit-load of work.
Yes, and a lot of it would be fairly redundant too. I don't mean to brag but I
agree with Rich, given our features list our stability is fairly good.
--
Guillaume.
http://www.telegraph-road.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
