On Monday 21 July 2003 22:20, Chris wrote: > Not at all -- go ahead. Be aware that bug reports are best filed in the > SourceForge bug trackers for the project, so that we don't overlook or > forget about them, although there's nothing wrong with sending them to > the list as well if you think they're likely to provoke discussion.
Thanks. I haven't had any objections so I'll send my emails shortly. Regrettably, I've no code for any of my suggestions or bug reports at this atage. BTW, it's great to see the Rosegarden project is still highly active even after nearly 9 years. I hadn't tried RG4 until very recently. I'm very impressed by its potential, especially for notation editing. I've been using the original Rosegarden since your very earliest version at Bath U. and done a great deal of composition and MIDI sequencing with it. Rosegarden 2.1 has been a fantastic tool. However, it's finally time for me to move on from RG2.1 because ALSA does not seem to support the old OSS sound driver properly despite its claims of full compatibility. I look forward to following and perhaps contributing to RG4 development. You probably won't remember a pile of email I sent you, Rich, and Andy in 1996 giving far too many bug reports and suggestions for new features. Apologies for another pile coming soon! William ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
