William wrote: > BTW, I wish anon CVS on S.F. would run 100x quicker. It's been > extremely unreliable and slow in the last 2-3 weeks.
Yes, they claim they've diverted resources away from it in order to improve the developer CVS access until they manage to get more servers or something. There was a vague August-ish date mentioned for that. Apart from anything else, anon CVS is currently configured to be 24 hours behind developer CVS (apparently). > Is non-anonymous CVS on S.F. working much better at the moment? Is > the command-line for doing a non-anonymous CVS download of the latest > RG4 the same as for anon CVS but with your S.F. username as the login > name? I believe you have to be a registered developer of a project to use its developer CVS (which I think is the only non-anonymous CVS service). I guess that's why SF can reliably divert resources towards it without expecting it to just get swamped with ex-anonymous users. I think developer CVS always includes write access as well as read access, too. The whole situation is basically just a big pain. I'm hoping it'll improve in August so we don't have to get off our arses and do something else about it. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here: http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/345/0 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
