On Saturday 11 October 2003 16:15, Chris Cannam wrote:
> * Guillaume, you wrote the conditional at rosegardensequencer.cpp:517
> which looks like it's supposed to be an optimisation. Is that all it
> is? I've commented it out because it was one of the things breaking
> count-in, but I'd like to be sure I'm not breaking something else.
If I recall correctly I added that because in some cases that method was being
passed negative times and would thus loop forever because
moveIteratorToTime() doesn't handle that case properly. But I'm not quite
sure of that. Leave it commented, we'll see soon enough if it cases any
problems.
> longer switch the record metronome on. I assume the reason nobody
> has extended the control block to list record and play muting
> separately is that the MetaIterator on the sequencer side doesn't
> actually know whether it's recording or playing? Should we make it
> so that it does, or should we rewrite the control block every time we
> switch from record to play or back again?
I'd say go for the simpler solution : updating the control block is
practically a no-cost operation. That said, may be the sequencer has other
reasons to know whether it's recording...
--
Guillaume.
http://www.telegraph-road.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
