On Saturday 11 October 2003 3:43 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > I'd say go for the simpler solution : updating the control block is > practically a no-cost operation. That said, may be the sequencer has > other reasons to know whether it's recording...
The sequencer knows when it's recording or when it's playing - check the transport status. The record/play metronome distinction is purely a gui notion - there is only the need to map _a_ metronome at the sequencer and the gui can control in what situations it appears. From a user point of view the metronome has to be consistent i.e. if you have the metronome on when recording then the next time you record it's also on, if you have the metronome off during playback then again the traversal from recording to playback should ensure that state matches. R ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
