On Tuesday 14 Oct 2003 3:57 pm, Bob Ham wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 16:05, Richard Bown wrote:
> > Ta, although changing those ints to unsigned ints throws warnings
> > up for me now (gcc 2.96).
>
> *cough*dodgey*distro*cough* :)
I thought SuSE 8.0 had used gcc 2.95, but I guess I was wrong. They
do seem to have a history of dodgy compilers though -- witness the
gruesome gcc-3.3-pre shipped with 8.2, with optimisation bugs that
actually prevent SuSE's own Rosegarden-4 package from working. Mind
you RedHat and Mandrake have both shipped highly dubious compiler
configurations before now too.
Anyhow, look at one of your patches:
PropertyDefn<P>::parse(std::string)
{
throw(0);
+ return "";
}
Are you really claiming that it's a _good_ thing for a compiler to
issue a warning if that return is absent?
Chris
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
