On Wednesday 15 October 2003 09:02, Chris Cannam wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 Oct 2003 9:06 pm, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14 October 2003 20:04, Chris Cannam wrote:
> > > Are you really claiming that it's a _good_ thing for a compiler
> > > to issue a warning if that return is absent?
> >
> > I don't know about him, but I am.
>
> Why?
I'm not sure I want a compiler to do code analysis advanced enough to suppress
the warning because the only thing in your function is a throw(). It would
take an awful lot of time for a rather benign result.
--
Guillaume
http://www.telegraph-road.org
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provide better services:
Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
