On Sunday 05 September 2004 19:09, Silvan wrote: > On Sunday 05 September 2004 06:13 am, Chris Cannam wrote: > > listening on channel 10, and another synth doing anything left over. > > Each of these would be a different device in RG terms, with two of them > > defined as only having one channel each, another having the remainder, > > and all having the same connection. > > > > Needless to say this never got implemented. > > Yeah, I gotcha. I can see where that would be useful in that situation, > but I wonder if anybody ever does that anymore? It might not even be worth > implementing. It's probably OK to enforce single device/connection pairs > for the time being in any event, to avoid all this trouble.
Thanks to my USB devices I have now enough MIDI ports in my computer to avoid this setup, but I had to share ports between several external synths and devices some time ago, using the "thru" MIDI socket existing in many devices. Furthermore, ALSA MIDI ports are shareable by default. If (when) we have true ALSA output ports, that can be subscribed using external utilities, you will be able to subscribe RG to several external ALSA MIDI ports. or even to have several RG output ports subscribed to any number of other ports, and we shouldn't (or couldn't) impose restrictions to this. Regards, Pedro ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
