On Saturday 12 Feb 2005 19:36, Chris Cannam wrote:
> Since we don't care about exponents or bases or anything much else
> here, we can easily throw in a crappy reimplementation of atof to do
> the work here, and perhaps we should do that anyway.

OK, I've daringly committed exactly that.  Please test.

I'll happily back it out if someone suggests a better way of avoiding 
this kind of problem -- and although I'd still very much like to know 
what actually caused it in this instance, I'm not convinced that 
dealing with that particular cause would be enough, I'd still fear the 
same thing happening again for some other reason.


Chris


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to