Kevin Donnelly wrote: > On Thursday 06 October 2005 13:08, Peter Mogensen wrote: > >>The problem is that StaffGroups in Lilypond (and notation in general) >>can be build in many creative ways. There would need to be some kind of >>score-layout editor in RoseGarden to remove the need to edit the >>Lilypond file by hand. How this is done best depends on how the notation >> facilities in RoseGarden develops. >>My proposal simply aims at making the Lilypond file easier to manipulate >>and maintain. > > > Yes, but once you have a more organised structure, developing an editor for > the file becomes easier (eg something like a set of drop-down lists, or a > simple text field, to list which tracks get exported, for instance - > something similar to the word-processor print dialogue).
Correct... But some decision needs to be made about in which direction the notation capabilities of RG should develop. You could manage a lot of the currently missing features like repeats and score-layout with dialogues of options and segment properties. That would give a nice WYSIWYG notation editor, but probaby be just as powerful and easier to implement. Peter ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
