On Friday 09 Dec 2005 19:31, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Friday 09 Dec 2005 14:57, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > > Any difference seems to be negligible. There's variability from > > run to run with a spread of about seven seconds, and I don't see a > > clear winner emerging. HEAD is faster sometimes, and experiments > > is faster sometimes. Both are considerably slower to start if JACK > > is not running. > > Slower if JACK is _not_ running?
btw, for me it seems to make no easily observable difference whether JACK is running or not. Which does suggest the time is almost entirely waiting for GUI stuff, rather than waiting on the sequencer. For me... Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
