On Wednesday 28 Dec 2005 06:24, D. Michael 'Silvan' McIntyre wrote: > On Tuesday 27 December 2005 06:11 am, Chris Cannam wrote: > > Well, I don't find that it does particularly. > > It does particularly.
OK -- as far as I can be bothered with at the moment, you and Guillaume count as a majority. I'll improve or revert it. Sooner or later. > Could this whatever it's doing be cached in some way? I haven't > changed my obscenely huge collection of fonts in months. Annoyingly, I don't see any easy way to find out whether a cache is valid or not without doing all the same work anyway. I've looked more closely and I think this _can_ be threaded, although it's surely overkill. I'll see if I can think of anything simpler. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
