On Monday 04 Sep 2006 00:21, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On Sunday 03 September 2006 5:42 pm, Chris Cannam wrote: > > > IMHO, localizations should not pend releasing. Better idea would be to > > > provide a proper rosegarden.pot file for the stable release > > > > I'm not quite sure what you mean. > > I think I do. We can fool with the strings up until the release date, and > then release with a properly updated American English string set, leaving > it up to some other mechanism beyond our immediate concern to go back and > provide translations.
Ah, so the suggestion is that we don't bother to get the translations up to date at all for the feature release, but then rely on having a stable release series (which we don't currently have) and bringing the translations up to date gradually throughout that series? Well, that makes some sense. I think we'd have to overcome a bit of momentum in the other direction if we wanted to start thinking about an actual release series for 1.4 stable at this point (rather than a single release with possibly one or two bugfix releases as required, like 1.2.3 had). I'm not really mentally prepared for doing anything other than ripping up the tarmac after 1.4 (e.g. reorganising the code base as discussed previously). I think we should probably go ahead as planned for the moment, unless someone would like to step in and offer to coordinate future releases (including doing branch merges for post-1.4 fixes). > We don't have any guitar tab yet. [...] > I think you're talking about the guitar fretboard stuff. Sorry, yes, I was making the same old mistake. > Do they print? Apparently not. I can't think offhand of any obvious reason why not. It might be a simple fix once one gets into the code. I seem to remember Stephen reporting that he didn't know why they didn't print either (though that was obviously a while ago). > We especially need to make a decision on the parameter widgets. You and I > agree that the tabs are evil, but we're about going to have to do this > Pedro's way with bits of this and that missing from the stacked view, and > tabs by default, if we don't come up with some suitable collapsible frame > thing very quickly. OK, I've now committed a suitable collapsible frame thing. It still has room for improvement, and I may yet make the odd enhancement, but it feels pretty usable to me. What do you think? Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
