On Friday 30 Mar 2007 22:35, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > On Friday 30 March 2007 19:09, Chris Cannam wrote: > > Yes, I think that's fine. This isn't the only way the tempo ruler > > and (new) marker ruler differ -- if you add a new tempo in the > > tempo ruler, its location gets snapped to the nearest grid > > position, whereas in the marker ruler that doesn't happen. It was > > a deliberate decision in the tempo ruler, since I thought it was > > probably too hard to be very accurate with your positioning and so > > perhaps better to be imprecise but in a very predictable way. If > > you want precision, edit the tempo afterwards, or set the playback > > pointer precisely and then use Add at Playback Pointer. > > > > What do you think? Pros and cons? > > Looks fine to me. The only thing I'd do would be to make the tempo > mark a bit larger so it would be easier to aim at.
What I meant was, if the tempo ruler does it that way, so should the marker ruler. And if the marker ruler doesn't do it that way (as it appears it doesn't), then whatever reason there is for not doing it that way in the marker ruler might also apply to the tempo ruler. I'm interested in pros and cons across both rulers, not for the tempo one. i.e. they should be consistent, unless there's a real difference in usage. Chris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
