Chris Cannam wrote: > As a consequence, if Matthew -- or anyone else -- has a strong > interest in using KDE4 components in Rosegarden, the way to tell us > about it is to tell us exactly what it is that those KDE4 components > might bring. That's what we're missing here. We aren't going to > change our existing decision just for the sake of it; as developers of > a complex and mature application we are unlikely to be swayed by grand > future visions that may never pay off such as office integration; and > it doesn't help the clarity of the situation to conflate KDE community > with KDE code.
And... I'm not asking you to (at least, not at the moment ;-) ). I was just responding to a non-factual statement I thought was worth clarifying, not trying to start an argument again :-). -- Matthew ENOWIT: .sig file for this machine not set up yet ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
