On Monday 05 January 2009, Chris Cannam wrote: > That's generally always been true, but don't forget that "low spec > hardware" is not what it was. Rosegarden didn't get along well with > low spec hardware, back when "high spec" meant a 1GHz P3 with 256 meg > of RAM and a dedicated soundcard.
I've actually been finding that the bar keeps going higher over time, not really due to anything we're doing, but the general complexity of keeping everything else happy, which is not really living up to the promise of getting easier over time. > I agree that it's pointless to do new development in trunk, but bug > fixes there are still welcome. There will definitely be a 1.7.3 at > some point I agree on all but the "definitely" here, because I'm still being a stubborn negative jerk, but the time for 1.7.3 is after the port actually does something, as a final tide me over until it's fit for human consumption. At this point, it's impossible to guess what any timelines look like, and it's impossible to position this so we don't have to do a 1.7.4 and maybe a 1.7.5 and wind up like KDE with 10 3.5 releases to stall for time. Do it once, not twice, not three times. Once is one too many as it is. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
