2009/1/18 Heikki Johannes Junes <[email protected]>
> 2009/1/17 Chris Cannam <[email protected]>
>
>> Is it time to open this can of worms again, and relent on the matter
>> of using Qt classes in base?
>>
>> If so, should we be aiming for more or less std::string-free code, or
>> just incrementally allowing examples of QString to creep in?
>>
>> Chris
>
>
> Simplify, simplify, and simplify. That should be a working rule of thumb.
>
> If there will be some translatable strings in base, like error messages,
> then tr() produces automatically QStrings. In those cases, it is
> necessary to declare the translation context, since base classes do
> not inherit QOBJECT:
>
> ...
> #include <QCoreApplication>
> ...
> class myClass {
> Q_DECLARE_TR_FUNCTION(myClass)
> public:
> ... tr("Hello World!")...
> }
>
> Just go ahead.
>
> --
>
> Heikki
>
With 'S':
Q_DECLARE_TR_FUNCTIONS(myClass)
see (again):
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.4/i18n.html#translating-non-qt-classes
--
Heikki
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
