On Saturday 17 January 2009, Chris Cannam wrote: > Is it time to open this can of worms again, and relent on the matter > of using Qt classes in base?
I say so, yes. > If so, should we be aiming for more or less std::string-free code, or > just incrementally allowing examples of QString to creep in? I think we should just open the door to QString, and let the rest evolve gradually over time. When it makes sense to swap something to QString, do it. If there's no particular reason to do it, well, if it ain't broke, don't dick around with it just to be dicking around with it. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
